On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This update to gnome-sharp:
> gnome-sharp-2.20.0-1.fc10
> * Thu Jul 3 18:00:00 2008 Xavier Lamien <lxtnow[at]gmail.com>
> - 2.20.0 - Update release.
which should have been pre-announced to give time for other
maintainers to rebuild their packages has caused the breakage of a
large number of mono apps, including major apps like f-spot, beagle
and tomboy:
Broken deps for i386
----------------------------------------------------------
banshee-1.0.0-1.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
banshee-1.0.0-1.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
beagle-0.3.7-6.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-vfs-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
beagle-0.3.7-6.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
beagle-0.3.7-6.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
beagle-evolution-0.3.7-6.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
beagle-gnome-0.3.7-6.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
beagle-gnome-0.3.7-6.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-vfs-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
beagle-gnome-0.3.7-6.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
f-spot-0.4.3.1-2.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
f-spot-0.4.3.1-2.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-vfs-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
f-spot-0.4.3.1-2.fc10.i386 requires mono(gtkhtml-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
f-spot-0.4.3.1-2.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
gbrainy-0.70-1.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
gnome-do-0.4.2.0-2.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
gnome-subtitles-0.8-3.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
gnome-subtitles-0.8-3.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
gtksourceview-sharp-2.0.12-3.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
tomboy-0.11.0-3.fc10.i386 requires mono(gnome-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
tomboy-0.11.0-3.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp) = 0:2.16.0.0
tomboy-0.11.0-3.fc10.i386 requires mono(gconf-sharp-peditors) = 0:2.16.0.0
Could maintainers please be more aware of the number of packages that
their package can affect; co-ordinate with other maintainers so they
can rebuild immediately the new package is available (or at least very
soon after); and give a fair warning on fedora-devel-list (as was done
with the gnutls update) before going ahead with such a major soname
bump.
I know this is rawhide, but it could be made a tad bit smoother for
testers if there was a bit more co-ordination between maintainers.
A.
ho, sorry all for that.
I was bug'ed about the fact that gnome-sharp2.20 is required for many packages.
Just let me know if there is any other trouble.
I was bug'ed about the fact that gnome-sharp2.20 is required for many packages.
Just let me know if there is any other trouble.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
