On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 15:48 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:13:42 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > > Since the ia64 release was not done in sync with the other > > architectures > > Why not? This is the first "secondary arch" release to be available and we are still working out how to do things. I expect by F10 we should be releasing within a day and hopefully with all identical package versions as the primary arches. > > Where you differ from stock Fedora 9, did you do anything to get your > changes/patches be applied on F-9 and devel branches in cvs? All changes we needed for ia64 are in Fedora CVS so there are no special ia64 patches floating around for ia64. > > Is the ia64 Everything repo complete compared with the other arches? Not quite, I think we have about 98% of the packages building on ia64. Back at F8 I think we had about 80% or so. Also F8 was built completely from SRPMs outside of koji with hacked up scripts. We now build under koji/CVS just as the primary arches except for ours is a separate koji server. There has been major progress over the past 6 months. - Doug -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
