On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:31:50 -0800 "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Joshua C. <jjj123jjj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Fedora is supposed to be "on the bleeding edge". so i really don't > > see any reasons against (at least trying to) inserting this patch > > in some RCs. Lets see what'll happen. it is always possible to > > revert the patch. > > > You missed a very important point. Its not just bleeding edge... but > sustainable bleed-edge. > We work closely with upstream. And in the case of this specific kernel > patch. Doesn't everyone benefit by getting that patch into the > mainline kernel? > said upstream patch was merged by Linus for a short while and then reverted for quality reasons.... so that would be a strong indication of "maybe not a good idea" -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
