On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Alexander Boström <abo@xxxxxx> wrote: > Then how about this use case: > > To simplify the uninstallation of installed proprietary packages. I think you missed my point entirely about not standing up proprietary packages as the primary reason. Hopefully the original poster got my point. > I guess a way to do that would be to add support for uninstalling > autopackage packages using the PackageKit interfaces. I'm still waiting for someone to give me a comparison between the LSB/Berlin API concept and what autopackage currently does. Is there really a need for the LSB/Berlin API? Does it really do more than what the autopackage roadmap encompasses? Just from a motivations point of view, it seems to me that autopackage is meant to solve exactly the same problem as the LSB/Berlin API. And if that is the case, and its only implementation details that are different, then I think its probably appropriate for the LSB/Berlin API supporters to do a compare/constrast against the more mature autopackage concept so we can get a better understanding of the detailed differences. Sadly, such a comparison would need to use very small words, if I am to be part of the target audience. -jef"My comments should not be construed as support for autopackage."spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
