On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 16:18 +0200, Denis Washington wrote: > The problem I currently see with single-click install is that it still > relies on a single package format (.rpm), so there would have to be > several packages of the same application again. Another particular > problem I see is security: RPM runs as root, so post-install routines > will do so too. That's why I tried to do an architecture that works > without root privileges (in many cases at least). But maybe there are > are already plans how to address this? I must admit I'm not all that > well-informed about SuSE's one-click install. We've discussed this in detail on the PackageKit mailing list. > > Can we move followups to packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx rather > > than cc'ing all those lists? > > OK. I wanted to get as many parties as possible on board, but now > let's say: whoever likes to follow this discussion is encouraged to to > join packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [1]. Follow-ups should only > be sent there. Sure, you probably want to see the FAQ and mailing lists archives for PackageKit too. There's a real reason PackageKit doesn't support OCI, and another reason it supports catalog instead. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
