jeff wrote:
max wrote:
jeff wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
It depends on your definition of software, according to Fedora's
definitions firmware is not software it is content. I know this is a
word game, but think about it, what is the definition of software?
From the Oxford English Dictionary:
software
1. Computers. a. The programs and procedures required to
enable a computer to perform a specific task, as opposed to the
physical components of the system (see also quot. 1961). b. esp.
The body of system programs, including compilers and library
routines, required for the operation of a particular computer and
often provided by the manufacturer, as opposed to program material
provided by a user for a specific task.
I didn't realize fedora was claiming that firmware isn't software.
Now that is bullshit. You call it a word game, I'll call it what it
is. *Content??!* It's obviously software. I mean, it can be copied,
it can be rewritten (well, by the people in the castle with the
code), it can be compiled, etc... Clearly software. I guess you need
a PhD to delude yourself otherwise.
Usually techs are so precise, I can't believe the doublethinking here.
You are starting to work against yourself. Firmware usually comes with
my devices, it is reloadable but it comes with the device when I make
the purchase, I don't have to load firmware into a device to make it
work in the first place. It is part of the hardware because the
hardware requires it to run. I thought that was why software and
firmware where two different terms. Firmware is software but the
hardware relies on it to function and it is included in the purchase
price of the hardware. Software is generally acquired separately from
the hardware. Windows(software) comes preinstalled on many
computers(hardware) but I can remove windows and still have functional
hardware but if I remove the BIOS , windows nor linux will run.
If you remove the non-free software from tg3.c the device will still
work.
Completely? no loss of functionality whatsoever? can you still interact
with it? I need to be able to interact with a device in order for it to
be useful to me. My car will run without a driver but its not going
anywhere. My computer will run without an operator but human
interaction is required at some point to make it useful to me, if only
for initial setup.
"It is part of the hardware because the hardware requires it to
run", you wrote.
I phrased it poorly in hindsight but its more or less true in most
cases, or I should have said that its needed to interact with other
hardware or software. At some point it has to be configurable by a
person through some extension or another in order to be useful. I don't
think manufacturers obsessed with the bottom line are hiring programmers
to write unneeded firmware just to annoy free software advocates.
>What does that make the non-free software in tg3.c?
Unnecessary but is that the case in every instance?
I am perfectly willing to be educated/corrected and I have heard
arguments from both sides that have merit, I am tempted to send a copy
of the GPL to my lawyer and get the interpretation of someone who
doesn't have a horse in this race.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
