Re: PPC/PPC64 builders not working?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 17:36 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:30 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 16:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > I can't reproduce it on any of my machines -- the above is from
> > adding
> > > 'strace -f' to the specfile, and trying a scratch build.
> > 
> > This trick should likely be documented somewhere in our wiki to aid
> > people in trying to debug build failures.
> 
> Perhaps. Along with crap like this...
> 
> @@ -49,9 +50,20 @@ features from the command line.
>  
>  %build
>  %configure --disable-static
> -make %{?_smp_mflags}
> -doxygen doc/doxygen.conf
> -
> +#make %{?_smp_mflags}
> +expect <<EOF
> +spawn gdb --args doxygen doc/doxygen.conf
> +expect "(gdb)"
> +send "set pagination off\n"
> +expect "(gdb)"
> +send "set follow-fork-mode child\n"
> +expect "(gdb)"
> +send "run\n"
> +expect "(gdb)"
> +send "bt\n"
> +expect (gdb)
> +send "quit\n"
> +EOF
>  

Which leads to this....

Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
[Switching to process 3824]
0x0f425434 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpixman-1.so.0
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install graphviz.ppc
(gdb) 
bt
#0  0x0f425434 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpixman-1.so.0

... which in turn leads to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451831

No hardware access required :)

-- 
dwmw2

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux