Am Dienstag, 17. Juni 2008 17:00:11 schrieb David Woodhouse: > On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 08:37 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > > > Lorenzo Villani wrote, at 06/17/2008 08:12 PM +9:00: > > >> It seems that the PPC/PPC64 builders are stucked with our chainbuild: > > >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=664653 > > >> > > >> As far as I can tell, it has been at least 6-7 hours now that those > > >> builders are processing kdepimlibs build. > > >> > > >> Regards > > > > > > For at least 5 days ppc/ppc64 builds are stacked when > > > "dot" command (in graphviz) (or doxygen?) is called, see: > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-June/msg00719.ht > > >ml > > > > > > Also: > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=659366 > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=663323 > > > > > > ppc/ppc64 specific bug in graphviz (or doxygen?) > > > > any bugs filed yet? > > Just taking a moment to add 'strace -f' to the doxygen invocation in the > libburn specfile shows interesting behaviour... > > [pid 1268] execve("/usr/bin/dot", ["dot"..., "libburn_8h__incl.dot"..., > "-Tpng"..., "-o"..., "libburn_8h__incl.png"...], [/* 31 vars */] .... > [pid 1268] --- SIGILL (Illegal instruction) @ 0 (0) --- > [pid 1268] rt_sigreturn(0x4) = 0 > [pid 1268] --- SIGILL (Illegal instruction) @ 0 (0) --- > [pid 1268] rt_sigreturn(0x4) = 0 > [pid 1268] --- SIGILL (Illegal instruction) @ 0 (0) --- > > Did anyone even bother to file that bug yet? > > If not, how do you expect it to get fixed? > > I'm used to having to explain the basic mechanisms of "first you tell us > about the bug, and only _then_ can we fix it" to the Great Unwashed on > #fedora, but I kind of expect better from you lot :) the backtrace shows the problem in dot which is part of graphviz. Than -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
