On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 09:27 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "BN" == Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > BN> Make the report less buggy and not show up reviews that have > BN> non-resolved dependencies. > > "less buggy" is certainly loaded language. The report shows tickets > in the "Package Review" component that have no 'fedora-review' flag > set. It does that. I'm not sure how that behavior is somehow > "buggy". > > In any case, that's certainly something to look it, but it's also > quite orthogonal, since it doesn't really cover the majority of the > tickets I'm looking at. Plus it's not really problematic to submit > several interdependent review tickets. I guess the report could > filter out reviews that are dependent on non-"Package Review" tickets, > but that still doesn't solve the main problem. > > I'm kind of surprised there's reluctance to add a component since we > add one for every single new package. Surely they're not a scarce > resource. My point is that you could fix the report rather than change anything about the workflow. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
