jeff <moe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > > jeff wrote: > > That would be a reasonable change. How is it done in drivers where > > the firmware has always been known to be non-GPL but > > redistributable? tg3 might be a special case due to its copyright > > change. > The firmware hasn't always been known to be non-GPL. It was > distributed for years under the GPL, so it *is* GPL, but they are > violating the GPL by not shipping the source code. So go sue them for not giving you the source. Most probably they will just tell you that it was *never* placed under GPL, that this "GPL distribution" was just a mistake (now fixed). > Have you even looked at tg3.c or it's history? Yes, no. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
