Re: Proposal: bugzilla component for pre-review package development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "JS" == Jon Stanley <jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

JS> Maybe a trac instance on hosted?

For every separate package, when the submitters often don't even have
Fedora accounts?

JS> Or maybe a special status whiteboard that says "don't do anything
JS> with these" would be better than littering bugzilla with yet more
JS> irrelevant data :).

I don't see how a component differs from a status entry in that
regard.  Unless you're arguing that these things shouldn't be in
bugzilla at all, which I don't agree with.  If, however, you're saying
that we (the reviewers) should still have to open a ticket and look at
its whiteboard to know we shouldn't mess with it, then I contend
that's a needless waste of a very limited resource (reviewer time).

Putting tickets that don't contain packages for review under the
"Package Review" component makes about as much sense as putting them
under "kernel".

 - J<

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux