Re: documenting process for packages renamed upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 15 June 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:13 +1000, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > Is the process for renaming packages in fedora that have been renamed
> > upstream document on the wiki?  I haven't been able to find any
> > description of our process in that case.
> >
> > I think it happens often enough that the process should be written down.
> > As I understand it a new package review is not required in the case but
> > cvsadmin requests are needed to create the new package.
>
> If you don't find this, can you draft a page under User:Petersen,
> then ... well, I suppose you submit it to the Packaging SIG?  I think
> that group all have ACLs to update Packaging(.*).

Wouldn't the general renaming guideline apply?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux