Re: Changing noarch package to arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Updating did not remove /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Cython.  It left a
trail of empty subdirectories.

Uhm

rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Cython

If this wasn't cleaned up correctly, that suggests a problem with
Cython packaging not taking ownership of directories correctly.  If
the package(s) were constructed correctly they should clean up the
directories i think.

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Cython
Cython-0.9.6.13.1-3.fc9.noarch

Here's another question. Are there no files at all in the Cython directory structure? Perhaps something created an untracked file in there and that's why the directories weren't cleaned up. (If not, there's indeed a bug in somewhere.) (Although it didn't exist ~6 months ago when I had a package go from noarch => arch specific.)

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux