> Hi, > > A friend of mine pinged me and asked about the status of this bug > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442921 > > Just using this as an example here since it a simple one. This is > apparently just a simple missing dependency but hasn't been fixed in a > while. Just using this as a example, assuming that the maintainer is > busy, on vacation or something and cvsextras is open, many others could > fix this issue bypassing the primary maintainer for the moment but there > doesn't seem to be any policy on what kind of fixes can be collectively > done. I remember seeing similar discussions before so this isn't a > isolated problem. Do we need some guidelines on this so folks like > Michael Schwendt (again, just as an example specific to this bug report) > can just go ahead and fix the problem noting the details in the commit > message instead of having to file a bug report? My left brain side says, maybe we need a policy. My right brain side says, if the acl is open, and you can fix it, fix it. Might actually check out doing that on some easy bugs I've reported. -J > Rahul > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
