On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 12:17 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > This is the current UI of gpk-application in git master (and rawhide > > from today): http://www.packagekit.org/temp/gpk-application.png > > > > It fixes most of the problems with PackageKit 0.1.x (other than the > > slowness [1]) and I'm hoping to get a build in F9 updates-testing > > sometime soon. The update viewer and the other tools have also seen some > > love too. > > > > Comments/suggestions welcome, > > In the bottom right corner where you display the license tag, make each > named license into a hyperlink to the actual online text. Since we have > a pretty well defined list of allowed licenses in Fedora, we ought to be > able to identify the online URL for each. The main hard thing would likely > be the BSD licenses for which there are sooo many subtle differences in > the exact wording people use, even though they're all basically the same. Yes, and PackageKit supports licence texts that can be quite complicated, or where packages have two alternate licences. A link isn't so easy. > > [1] ???we're still working on a new (much faster) yum backend > > Would that be the 'yum2' backend ? Or are you working on a 'yum3' backend... yum2 - it's not quite ready for primetime but you can experiment by editing the PackageKit.conf configuration file. If it breaks, you get to keep both pieces :-) Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
