We currently have libOSMesa's soname pinned at libOSMesa.so.6 rather than upstream's libOSMesa.so.7, because there was no effective ABI change between the two. This is kind of lame. We are also building three copies of libOSMesa, one for each of 8, 16, and 32 bits per pixel. This is wasteful since, I believe as of Mesa 6.5.something, it's possible to build a libOSMesa that can do all three depths. So I'd like to fix both of these things in F10. I'd like to ship exactly one copy of the library, built for all three depths, with an soname of libOSMesa.so.7. Repoquery tells me the following packages will be affected: kbiof - owned by oddsocks (Ian Chapman) paraview - owned by orion (Orion Poplawski) vtk - owned by athimm (Axel Thimm) So if this is you, consider yourself informed, and please raise objections soon if at all. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
