Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2008-06-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 19:54 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:31:08 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 12:24 -0400, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Broken upgrade path report for repositories F7, F7-updates, F7-updates-
> > > testing, F8, F8-updates, F8-updates-testing, F9, F9-updates, F9-updates-
> > > testing, F7, F7-updates, F7-updates-testing, F8, F8-updates, F8-updates-
> > > testing, F9, F9-updates, F9-updates-testing, rawhide
> > 
> > This one is much closer to right.  It's still not attaching package
> > owner names, and I don't think it's actually checking rawhide correctly.
> 
> If I remember correctly, repo ids must contain a number, which is
> searched for. So, "rawhide" => "F10-development", for example.

Yeah, I fixed that locally.  "rawhide" gets into the set of repos to
look at, as per the blurb above, but it doesn't seem to show up in the
output.  Which I know is bogus, since I just fixed an EVR inversion in
rawhide today.

- ajax

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux