On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:35 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, David Timms wrote: > > It would sort of make sense to be able say in a spec: > > Provides: pirut(functionality) > > ie equivalent functionality = gui package management > > rather than the pirut(api) ? > > "Pirut" is just a name and an implementation detail, you'd want something > along the lines of "Provides: package-manager-gui" similarly to httpd > providing "webserver" etc, that apps just wanting a GUI package manager > can depend on. Blindly adding provides for everything obsoleted is just > BAD, unless they actually provide a compatible interface (be it API or > command names). Although it does make the point that we should dig out the python auto-provides/requires and see about enabling them again. That would then add the fact that pirut had provided a certain API which was required by things. Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
