On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:15:33 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams scripst: >> On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 22:58 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote: >>> could you point out why exactly there is "something to do"? >>> >>> I mean, python3000 is a new language and no replacement so if someone >>> is willing to package it (or a package that depends on py3k) she/he >>> should make sure its a python2.x compatible installation (especially in >>> the naming of the package). That should be all, right? >> >> Python 2.x *will* be discontinued at some time in the future. It may be >> a few years, but it will happen. > > Wouldn't it be more prudent to upgrade just to python 2.6 (asap) and let > one or two Rawhide cycles to make all warnings disappear? Theoretically, probably. I'm not sure we have enough eyeballs that could make that happen though. -Yaakov -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
