On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:18:21PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > 2008/6/6 Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Per discussion here: > > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-December/msg00355.html > > and followup here: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-December/msg00409.html > > > > Is there a reason we aren't using nscd by default? > > > > I would say the current DNS situation is the most annoying desktop > > networking-related bug in the OS. > > > Or, as I think I point out somewhere in that thread, use dnsmasq which is > designed to solve exactly this problem. And it even has a D-BUS interface. > The only objection was something about DNSSEC. Which can always be fixed... I'm not sure. As far as I know dnsmasq doesn't support recursion and caching so you don't get any advantage when you enable it. (btw recursion has to be supported to have DNSSEC-aware resolver) Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
