On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:51 PM, David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip <at> kanarip.com> writes: >>> >>> Would a "Obsoletes: pirut" have been more accurate and appropriate here? >> >> There's both an Obsoletes and a Provides, the Obsoletes makes sense, the >> Provides not really, and it causes issues like this. > > It would sort of make sense to be able say in a spec: > Provides: pirut(functionality) > ie equivalent functionality = gui package management > rather than the pirut(api) ? Obsolete: pirut -> pirut is dead, this replace pirut, other apps that depends on pirut - break their dependencies Provides: pirut -> pirut is still alive, this package now include pirut, other apps that depend on pirut - retain dependencies > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Mohd Izhar Firdaus Bin Ismail Amano Hikaru 天野晃 「あまの ひかる」 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MohdIzharFirdaus http://blog.kagesenshi.org 92C2 B295 B40B B3DC 6866 5011 5BD2 584A 8A5D 7331 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
