On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:00:08 +0100 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 13:01 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 18:10 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > Maybe it could also be possible for some employees to go through regular > > > sponsorship and use the regular CLA. I understand that it is not always > > > possible, sometime redhat wants to hire somebody to work on packages > > > without going through the fedora formal process, but I think that > > > @redhat people interested in being part of the fedora community are > > > likely to be able to go through the fedora process (even though not when > > > they have just arrived). > > > > Regardless if which method they obtain CLA, once they end their > > employment with Red Hat that CLA is technically no longer valid, > > particularly if they take employment with somebody else. Sadly this > > is a pretty big gaping hole in our system. > > Do I need to execute the CLA now? I certainly don't intend to stop > maintaining any of my packages (except RHEL glibc-kernheaders! Yay!). Yes. But your new employer might be interested in having a company-wide CLA as Dell and IBM do. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
