On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:58:05 +0100 Paul <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get monodevelop-1.0 to build for F9, but it looks like > something is snarled up somewhere with koji > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=648795 > > Koji is complaining that gtksourceview2-sharp-devel and > mono-basic-devel don't exist despite them plainly being there. Hmm, very odd, don't know what's going on there. > The build log is showing something really odd > > ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target x86_64 > --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/monodevelop.spec'], False, > '/var/lib/mock/dist-f9-build-201996-35034/root/', None, 0, True, 0, > 423, 104, None, logger=<mock.trace_decorator.getLog object at > 0x2aaab0e8bf90>) > Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target > x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/monodevelop.spec'] /etc/profile: > line 38: /bin/hostname: No such file or directory sh: gacutil: > command not found sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > sh: gacutil: command not found > warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: hammer2.fedora.redhat.com > Building target platforms: x86_64 > Building for target x86_64 > Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/monodevelop-1.0-6.fc9.src.rpm > > Any ideas on what is going wrong here? I've tried both a normal and > scratch build with the same level of success. That all looks like the normal output for a successful build of the SRPM in a mock chroot with gacutil and hostname not present. The SRPM build worked OK. The problem isn't here, it's the apparently missing buildreqs mentioned earlier. Paul. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
