On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 00:27 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > No. I reviewed this package and actually some files in src/ are > actually licensed > under strict GPLv2, which renders the license of bmpx to be strict > GPLv2. You were right, I was wrong. bmpx is going to be a concern for cdparanoia. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
