On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 05:22 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:10:59AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > The difference in the spelling of the codeset breaks Sylpheed (#450063) > > which only looks for codeset "UTF-8". Now where again is it defined > > that both are valid spellings for the codeset? > > Then Sylpheed is just broken. It shouldn't look at the locale name, > but instead at nl_langinfo (CODESET) (the same can be queried from > locale -k LC_CTYPE | grep ^charmap= > ). > And, no matter what spelling you use in the .* part of locale name > in environment, CODESET is the same: > > LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 locale -k LC_CTYPE | grep charmap > charmap="UTF-8" > LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 locale -k LC_CTYPE | grep charmap > charmap="UTF-8" > LC_ALL=en_US.utf-8 locale -k LC_CTYPE | grep charmap > charmap="UTF-8" > LC_ALL=en_US.UTF_8 locale -k LC_CTYPE | grep charmap > charmap="UTF-8" > > Jakub > Sounds sane, though I faced very similar problem with Evolution some time back, when my e-mail written in Czech (with diacritic marks) was delivered broken - because only Evolution was able to tell what utf8 charset actually is... Of course, manually setting it to UTF-8 fixed the issue... I wondered whether the problem was due to wrong setting after upgrading to Fedora 9 or something else, but I didn't pursued the issue further. Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
