On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 16:18 -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:02 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't really care if it comes across or bias or not. We have most of > > the package mgmt infrastructure written in python. It just makes sense > > to write apps like this to use the same libs, if only b/c then it > > behaves consistently. > > If you have a package that has the sole task of helping to cull down > the list of installed packages, you'd want it to depend on the minimum > number of packages so you could cull, for example, python. It is very hard to remove python from a fedora system and have a functional (or even quasi-functional system) so why don't we start with that given. > From the > description of the OP, it looks like it doesn't do dependency > resolution, just rpm -e, so there is no behaviour to keep consistent. /me boggles. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list