Re: rpmreaper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 16:18 -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:02 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I don't really care if it comes across or bias or not. We have most of
> > the package mgmt infrastructure written in python. It just makes sense
> > to write apps like this to use the same libs, if only b/c then it
> > behaves consistently.
> 
> If you have a package that has the sole task of helping to cull down
> the list of installed packages, you'd want it to depend on the minimum
> number of packages so you could cull, for example, python. 

It is very hard to remove python from a fedora system and have a
functional (or even quasi-functional system) so why don't we start with
that given.


> From the
> description of the OP, it looks like it doesn't do dependency
> resolution, just rpm -e, so there is no behaviour to keep consistent.

/me boggles.
-sv



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux