On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 17:30 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > Hi all, > > At Thursday's FESCo meeting, it was decided to delay the upcoming FESCo > election since we are working on defining what FESCo's > role/responsibility will be in the future. Until this is finished, we > felt that it didn't make sense to run the election since candidates > expectations of FESCo's role might be different than what it evolves > into. We're hoping this will be resolved fairly soon, and we'll send > out an announcement on the decision and when the new election will be > held. If anyone has any questions, don't hesitate to contact me. This would be an opportune time also to solicit community input on this issue. I'd expect it would be more important to hear from people who are materially affected by FESCo, i.e. people who are doing development or packaging work in Fedora. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
