On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 11:01 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 10:45 -0400, James Antill wrote: > > > Probably the most interesting python application is yum, as if it > > breaks you can't easily update/install to fix anything, and it currently > > depends on: > > > > pygpgme - binding > > python-iniparse > > rpm-python - binding > > urlgrabber > > yum-metadata-parser - binding > > > > the other question I have is how many of the 'batteries included' > modules in python will not yet be ported to py3k? I mean if something > like bzip2 or fnmatch or logging isn't ported yet we will have issues. The stdlib is about 98% ready. The big things to watch for are the removed modules, not many of which yum et al are terribly likely to use (md5 and sha, off the top of my head). -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
