On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:48:11PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:01:02PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> > >> > > >> >> astromenace-1.2-8.fc9 (build/make) limb > >> > > >> > Already foxed qof. astromenace builds fine locally, but it looks like > >> > this build failed because it was missing sdl-config, which is in > >> > SDL-devel, an explicit BR, which mock pulled. Running my own mock > >> build > >> > against devel now as a test. . . > >> > >> Finished. Same error. Builds just fine oon fc9 local. > > > > There's something wrong with $PATH for the build user inside the > > buildroot when it fails for me. I built it inside mock again, and see > > the same failure. However, if I edit the makefiles to point at > > /usr/bin/sdl-config instead of simply sdl-config, it succeeds. > > Could this be causing other problems/failures as well? Turns out it's not quite that simple... I just didn't let it run long enough. >From sitting inside the chroot, as the building user, I run: $ make Linking CXX executable AstroMenace c++: `/usr/bin/sdl-config: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [AstroMenace] Error 1 make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/AstroMenace.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 but of course it's present. CMakeFiles/AstroMenace.dir/link.txt is our culprit. If you look at that file, the line length is huge (>10k characters). The `sdl-config --libs` is not getting evaluated in a shell, like the code expects, it's being evaluated by /usr/bin/c++, which of course fails. Short story is, the invocations of sdl-config --libs and sdl-config --cflags should happen not quite as late as they are, but earlier, where they can be evaluated and expanded by Makefile and not by c++. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
