On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:33 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Simo Sorce <ssorce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I am very glad the debian guys got "all cranky" on this issue, > Temrinating network connections just because a component need > to > resytart is plain silly. > > DBus is not the same as any other random software because it is > explicitly designed to provide reliable communication *between* > components, much like the kernel. If you restart it at random times > that reliability guarantee is destroyed. > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2005-March/thread.html#00027 > Simo's point still holds though. What you've described above is a better reason to have not designed nm around dbus not a reason why we should be okay with our network services going away when we restart dbus. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
