On Thu, 29 May 2008, G wrote: > specifiy whats the enhnacement is about. I did notice that there are > some bug fixes too made which has got the word "bugfix" but does not > map to a Bug ID i.e, the Bug ID is not mentioned in the updates. It I am using "bugfix" also if the package fixes an upstream bug or multiple of them and I surely won't open a bug report to myself to clone the maybe or maybe not existing upstream bug report. If upstream says, the release is a bugfix release, I'm marking as such. And if I've a bug report in Red Hat Bugzilla to it, I'll mention it, if there's none, it's not my problem. IMHO, you first should make the possibility to reference to upstream bug tracking tools and hey, there is a DESCRIPTION field as well which can be used to put information into. You don't always need a fscking bug report - sorry ;-) Sorry, but I'm pissed off by bodhi, because pushing e.g. security updates takes sometimes very long or same for feature updates. This was also in some discussion with Paul W. Frields here around LinuxTag as a problem for us as packagers. Maybe we can get rid of the REAL problems first before messing around with possible "features". Thank you. Greetings, Robert -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
