On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 04:41:23PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> writes: > > PD> It is, although shipping different packages in one (with different > PD> release schedules, tarballs, authors etc.) is bad > PD> practice. Normally this is raised during reviews, but not here. > > Well, this was explained in the review ticket: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167376 > > "This package is a bit odd. To avoid circular dependencies, I've > bundled DateTime, DateTime::Locale, and DateTime::TimeZone." > > I'm not sure of the best way to avoid those circular dependencies, but > surely bundling a few closely related and very small modules is low on > the hierarchy of packaging sins. I think that it is perfectly right, in fact. > PD> I suggest that you open a bug against perl-DateTime. > > Not sure what good it would do, given the above. Indeed, sorry, I missed the explanation. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
