Till Maas wrote:
On Monday 26 May 2008 13:57:37 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
At the moment all OCaml related bugs have 'ocaml' in the Summary line,
and I have some searches which are basically freeform searches which
check for 'ocaml' in the Summary. It would be nice to have a better
more official way to handle this. Perhaps by depending on a "master"
bug (the same way that ExcludeArch / Blocker bugs are tracked).
Imho the summary is a good place for this, because then one can easily check
and filter for a particular language on the review mailinglist. Also it can
be easily seen on a bug search results page. Maybe it could be agreed on a
special way to mention it in case it is not already obvious, e.g. add the
language in parenthesis after the package name, e.g.
Review Request: foobarmatic (ruby) - some foo for bar
But language as a freeform random part of summary is not very clear either.
Review Request: foobarmatic c - some foo for C++ code documentation parsing
Review Request: foobarmatic written in c++ - makes ruby colored slippers
Review Request: foobarmatic perl - pythons on a plane
Seems like use of a whiteboard status flag or tracker bug would be much more
useful than trying to randomly search out those summary clues.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0x8300BF29 fingerprint 071D FFE0 4CBC 13FC 7DEB 5BD5 5F89 8E1B 8300 BF29
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
