Re: Plan for tomorrows (20080522) FESCO meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 23, 2008, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> 
>> Any reason to not have moved it to the firmware/ dir, as I expected
>> from looking at your patches?
>> 
>> rm -rf firmware/ is so much simpler :-)

> For your purpose, wouldn't you want to separate
> source-available-firmware and documentation-available bit settings
> from the parts that would be more difficult for you to modify freely?

For my purpose, yes, removing firmware that is Free would be
unnecessary.  But if it can be packaged separately and there are
advantages to it, why take the technically inferior course of action?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member       ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux