Re: gkrellm themes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 20 May 2008 14:29:06 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> We have a list of acceptable licenses here:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

OK, I took a look at the list ... wow that is a long list!  I guess a lot of 
folks like spending time crafting unique licenses.

I assume all licenses in the "good" list are OK and all in the "bad" list are 
not.

Do you have a suggestion as to a "preferred" license for this kind of 
stuff ... graphics and configuration files mostly.  I would really like to 
get most folks to all use the same license (see below).

Also, do you have any suggestions on how to handle cases where multiple 
individuals have had their hand in things:  A creates a theme.  B then 
modifies A's theme to create a new theme.  C comes along and modifies B's 
theme plus add some stuff from a theme created by D to create yet another 
theme.  That may sound convoluted but it appears to be the case for some of 
these themes.

I also assume that any theme citing Carsten Haitzler's (Rasterman's) 
enlightenment window manager as a source is OK (I do not need that author's 
blessing too).

I am not sure what will be needed in the SPEC file with respect to licensing 
(since you are reviewing spec files).  I sure do not want to see a bunch of 
theme packages ... one for every license type.  That is too much 
over-achieving.

Gene

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux