Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 15:28:21 +0200
pertusus@xxxxxxx (Patrice Dumas) wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 08:26:38PM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
== Fix issues caused by sponsored maintainers ==
If one of your sponsored maintainers is unable to fix an issue in
their package(s), it's up to the sponsor to step in and make the
needed fixes. This might include pushing a security update when the
maintainer is unavailable, applying a patch, removing a improperly
build package, or other time or security sensitive issue. Note that
the maintainer should be shown the fix and how to manage the issue
moving forward.
There are many technical issues here. It would be nice if a sponsor
could be in initialCC/Watchcommit/commit for all the packages of a
sponsored person (and not by package), without needing a manual
intervention from the sponsored person, and such that the sponsored
person cannot revoke it. Also it should be easy to give up with those
acls when the sponsor thinks that the sponsored person is competent
enough.
Yeah, that would be nice. Pkgdb enhancement it sounds like...
could you file it?
Just a note: This would be a large change to the packagedb. If someone
wants to spearhead implementation of it, let me know and I'll outline
some of the changes that will need to be made.
-Toshio
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
