On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 11:56 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri May 23 2008, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:25:01PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > > No, we probably *do* want people using NetworkManager here because > > > maintaining two entirely orthogonal network stacks is somewhat insane > > > and makes the rest of the system harder to manage. > > > > Right, now *this* one I see as a strong selling point -- but it's selling > > more to the system developers than to sysadmins (and, presumably, > > enterprise Linux customers, if that's on anyone's mind...). > > It is also helpful for users, e.g. I use my notebook sometimes in places where > it gets a dynamic ip address, sometimes where it has its static ip address. > Here it would also be nice to have only one tool that can handle both instead > of two that can handle only some parts. Right; simply because you don't keep your laptop in one place all the time, it's definitely a candidate for NM. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
