Re: upstart plans for F10+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 02:39:37AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> >>Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >>>Since I've been asked in various places what we're planning to do with 
> >>>upstart now that Fedora 9 has shipped, I figured I'd
> >>>lay out the basic plan.
> >>Might not be entirely related but are we going to get rid of the conflict 
> >>between network and NetworkManager service by Fedora 10?
> >
> >What conflict is there? They're using the same configurations...
> 
> Why is there two different services? IIRC, I can't start both services 
> together in Fedora 9.

Yes you can - just add NM_CONTROLLED=no to the files

 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-XXXX

that you want NM to ignore.

Dan.
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux