Re: upstart plans for F10+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Colin Walters (walters@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > - Reworking things like netfs to be more sane, when
> >  it comes to networks coming and going, network block devices being
> >  attached and detached, and so on
> 
> Aren't pretty much all kernel based network filesystems broken in the
> world of dynamic networking?

I mean, right now we have a static init script that runs once
on boot to mount NFS, SMB, etc, and set up network block devices.
It's also (in F9) kicked when NM brings up a new default route.

What would be sane is to have it just mount things when it can
reach the proper network, and lazily unmount them when that
network goes away. Heck, this can be extended to all filesystems -
why should you do mount -a to mount /usr/local - why not just
have anything in fstab automatically mounted when the device with
the proper filesystem signature is found?

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux