Re: upstart plans for F10+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:31:07PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Once we get upstart 0.5 in, we can then look at potentially moving
> > some subset of things that are now handled elsewhere to upstart.
> > Examples would be:
> >
> > - Always-on services such as dbus, syslog, and audit
> 
> Last time I talked to Scott he had in-progress code to make 0.5 manage
> the system bus internally.  If the system bus depends on syslog and
> audit those may need to be started too.
> 
> > - Reworking things like netfs to be more sane, when
> >  it comes to networks coming and going, network block devices being
> >  attached and detached, and so on
> 
> Aren't pretty much all kernel based network filesystems broken in the
> world of dynamic networking?

Not to mention network based block devices too...

Dan
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux