Re: Recomposing with generic-logos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham wrote:
Can you compare the package set on the compose?


A `diff -u` of "ls *.rpm" is at http://fpaste.org/paste/2289

A complete diff of the contents of stage2.img is at http://fpaste.org/paste/2290

By 'result' you mean the installer, not live, correct? What appears
to have happend is you didn't include the @fonts group in your compose,
so you have no fonts for anaconda to use.


result in this case is the installer (images/media), yes.

Both composes use external repositories to get the packages needed -as per a backported fix from wwoods-, and hence the package payload in the composed tree isn't as much related to the composing of the installer images anymore. Including @fonts in the package set didn't help.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux