Re: F9 potential service network bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Wouters (paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Mine was from a non-LiveCD. The ifcfg files generated look fine:
> 
> # Intel Corporation 82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro 100
> DEVICE=eth0
> BOOTPROTO=static
> HWADDR=00:d0:b7:85:f6:03
> ONBOOT=no
> DHCP_HOSTNAME=bofh.xelerance.com
> 
> # Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet
> DEVICE=eth1
> BOOTPROTO=static
> HWADDR=00:0c:76:bc:9b:d1
> IPADDR=193.110.157.17
> NETMASK=255.255.255.248
> ONBOOT=yes
> 
> eth0 has (or had) no link during install.
> 
> To be it looked like despite being confgured with BOOTPROTO=static, the
> avahi daemon and NetworkManager got started, and one of them started
> doing dhcp. The static IP did appear as an additiona IP on the eth1
> interface, but since the DHCP was the main address, my public ip address
> changed.

ONBOOT=no means that NM won't try to automatically bring it up. That
may be what you're seeing.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux