darrell pfeifer wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the rationale of purposely breaking sound for
most people in rawhide. While the fedora kernel guys are speedy, it
could be a while before a kernel with the patch appears.
I know rawhide people take their chances. Still, I would have thought
waiting a bit for the kernel to sync up with the patch would have been a
more prudent option.
I would gladly sync my data to a non-development version of Fedora and
continue to use rawhide on my main box (and presumably file more bug
reports) if such things were better coordinated. I still do something
similar but usually more to the end of the development cycle ~ last
couple of months or so.
This isn't just for getting better feedback from testers but also making
rawhide a better development environment. The recent yum or glibc issues
in rawhide would have affected a lot of developers too. We haven't had a
shabby job of this at all but we could certainly do it better.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
