I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.ppc requires /usr/bin/perl
On x86_64:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl
On i386:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.i386 requires /usr/bin/perl
On ppc64:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.ppc64 requires /usr/bin/perl
On ppc:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On x86_64:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On i386:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On ppc64:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
This is just fuzz and I can ignore it, right?
Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
