Re: rawhide bugs becoming F-9 bugs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 03:11:30AM -0700, Andrew Farris wrote:
So the question is, if not NOW at release, then when should those open bugs be changed to a release version? How much harder would it be to do later than it is now?

If you are going to change rawhide bugs to Fx bugs at Fx release time, why even have rawhide as a bugzilla version at all? Why not report bugs in what will become F10 under version F10 now? You can tell from the reported date that it was during the development cycle of F10.

If people can't be bothered to update a bug once every 6 months if it still applies to the latest version, then it should be closed WONTFIX. Leaving it as "rawhide" forever does no one any good.

So I propose to get rid of "rawhide" as a Bugzilla version, and create the F10 version NOW, and likewise, create Fx Bugzilla versions at the time Fx is branched in CVS.

+1

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux