Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoth Les Mikesell:
> Callum Lerwick wrote:
> I think ATrpms pre-dates fedora. Freshrpms certainly did.  Do you think 
> you can retroactively trademark the package names or something?

Red Hat Linux pre-dates Fedora also, but it doesn't claim to provide packages 
for Fedora 8.

-- 
Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux