Re: FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason L Tibbitts III schrieb:
"KH" == Karsten Hopp <karsten@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

KH> I'd like to see a reviewer guideline instead that new packages
KH> should be checked if they really need to run autofoo during the
KH> build and if they really require to be built with ancient autofoo.

Could you write a draft for consideration by the packaging committee?
List it in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo
and the committee will take a look.

Please be sure that the draft provides sufficient information on how
reviewers can detect and how packagers can avoid the behavior you
would like to discourage.

 - J<


The initial version is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/AutoConf.

   Karsten

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux