On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 16:22 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 14:29 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote: > > > > > A page detailing the reasons for keeping the exception is now up on the > > > wiki: > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DeepakBhole/ReasonsForKeepingJPP > > > > Deepak, thanks for writing that up. Seth Vidal has helped me come up > > with a technical solution that should meet the requirements described in > > your document. > > > > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/exclude-by-group/ > > This seems very wrong. > > What I'm reading is that JPackage developers want to not use anything > in Fedora that also exists in JPackage. > > Isn't this better done by repo costs and similar plugins, rather > than hacks either in the package version or vendor which can > be easily fooled? repo costs only work for exact-matches of the package nevra - not partial matches. So one way or another you have to do this via a plugin. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
