On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:42:22 Warren Togami wrote: > Gerry Reno wrote: > > Ok, I put the bridge in ifcfg-br0, and create ifcfg-eth0/1 files as > > shown and still it does not work with NetworkManager. I have no br0 > > device. Going to try removing NetworkManager next. > > > > Regards, > > Gerry > > I'm pretty upset NetworkManager doesn't handle bridge interfaces yet > too. I'm told that NetworkManager will eventually need to support this > and everything else service network used to do. During this > transitional phase if you really want missing features then you need to > turn on service network. > > It is possible with the right configuration options to use both service > network and NetworkManager simultaneously. Yes, I have been able to run both NetworkManager and "the old way" at the same time. Unless the ifcfg file for a device is marked NM_CONTROLLED=yes, NetworkManager leaves it alone and the "old" system seems to leave NM_CONTROLLED=yes devices alone but you can use it to manage the other devices. There seems to have been a spurt of development/fix activity recently and (to me) NetworkManager is looking better (but still has some work to do). The only problem I have had is that using s-c-network to turn NM_CONTROLLED on or off (yes or no) is NOT detected by nm-system-settings whereas using vi to make the change is detected. Yes, this is bz'ed and I am waiting to see what the package manager/developer wants me to do ... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444502 -- Gene -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
