Re: FESCo Proposal for blocking older version of autoconf & automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 06 May 2008 11:02:33 Christopher Aillon wrote:
> he path to removing autoconf213 lies in someone patching upstream Firefox
> (along with whatever other packages still uses autoconf213) to use newer
> autotools and then waiting several Fedora release cycles, because this
> change is almost certainly not going to happen ever in Firefox 3.  Get it
> changed for Firefox 4 and when that rolls around in F13??, we can talk about
> dropping it.

I agree with this. Maybe we should have a project in F10 that does the 
migration work so that a future Fedora can remove the old packages. 

About 4 years ago, I noticed a lot of redundancy and took it upon myself to 
migrate packages to newer tools. I was able to move all of the core packages, 
in about a day, off of old autoconf and automake to the current releases. I 
also took the liberty of moving things to bison as there was no need for 
byacc.

I never ran into a package that could not be ported. I did run into packages 
that took some effort. :)

-Steve

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux